As Ukraine scales wartime procurement, two parallel marketplaces for military end users now exist: DOT Chain Defense and Brave1 Market.
Understanding the distinctions between these platforms isn’t just a matter of clarity for procurement officers, integrators, and defense contractors; it directly impacts contract execution, speed of delivery, and trust in the supply chain.
In my latest article, I break down:
1️⃣ The specific mandate and scope of each marketplace
2️⃣ How end users are expected to engage with them
3️⃣ The implications for industry partners navigating these systems
Defense procurement thrives on predictability and transparency. This piece provides a structured view of how these marketplaces differ, and what that means for those working to equip Ukraine’s armed forces.
National Security, Security Cooperation SME, International Relations, Consultant
8 hours ago
Thanks for sharing. Excellent run-down. Your point on institutional competition between Brave1/MDT and DOT/MOD is spot-on. Personal ambitions/egos get in the way of efficiency and practicality. Providing substantial funding directly to units on a monthly basis with limited oversight (Brave1 model) increases risk of corruption. I see the Brave1 model also increasing sustainment complexities across the force as well. It should also be a more tiered system with actually deployed frontline units recieving more funding and priority than those formations in the rear during refit. The other criticism of both models is the unit of purchase which is typically the complete system. How do units purchase spare parts to either repair equipment or bring defective systems up to operational standard? That was an issue when the DOT system initially came on line. Perhaps that has been fixed.